The views expressed in the articles we wrote years ago with emotional understandings in mind have mostly changed, and we no longer hold most of the views in the published articles.

Our understanding of freedoms, human rights, social order, State, Economics and Law is explained in terms of basic principles in the book "The Theory of Islamic Economic System", which we published in 2016, although our views have changed on some issues.

As a result of our methodological and conceptual studies, details about what the words used in the Quran mean and the functional applications of these concepts are also available in the same book. Anyone who wishes can examine these concepts.

Apart from this, the existence or non-existence of "God" is not a debatable issue. We cannot discuss a subject we know nothing about.

"Belief in God" and "religions" in the traditional sense are not a blessing that God brings to people in books, but a lie that people spread to God. The authors of the book called the Quran proposed an "order", but this is not "religion" as you know it.

Concepts such as Morality, Justice, Goodness and Evil have no connection with the Quran. These concepts are completely relative and vary according to each individual and each society. What is moral to you may be immoral to someone else. What is fair for one may not be fair for someone else. What is good for you may be bad for someone else. In other words, these concepts are concepts produced to manage societies within the conventional world order. Powerful concepts of enslave and rule.

On the other hand, although the traditionally known concepts of "adultery, worship" and similar concepts are described in the book, they are far from the traditional understanding.

If we live long enough, we hope to conclude a holistic study of what the "state" is and the associated economic and social mechanisms described by the Quran. Thus, it will be understood why laws are unnecessary and that social life is possible in accordance with human nature.

Therefore, those who read our articles will find a point of departure for themselves, but they should read them knowing that we no longer hold the same views.

Regards with respects..