The Quran does not have a state understanding. The Koran only suggests an institutionalized society. The meaning of this is simple. every institution is a state in its own right, but there is no people to govern. It just runs his business.

Laws are for institutions only, and each institution makes its own laws. So these laws only bind experts (Mu’min). When we say this, you are putting the "traffic rules" in front of us. But remember, traffic rules are for goods, not people. When you craft an item, you have to say how it should be used. Traffic rules are nothing more than this.

There are also those who claim that the state and laws should exist because of "damaging" acts such as theft and murder. First of all, there is no punishment for murder in the Quran. There is no punishment for theft too. We would like to remind you that the assumption that the concept of "adultery" is "crime of sexuality" is not due to the book, but because of your comments.

If every individual in a society has an income from the moment he was born, if they have the land to live on, if they can work, if they earns equal income with everyone, if they can buy whatever they wants or need, can you tell me why would this person commit a crime?

There is no law for people, no punishment, no guilty. All of them for institution. When a person goes to work, it is limited by the rules of the workplace. This is all.

There is no universal definition of crime and punishment. So crime and punishment were only invented by humans. The reason for this is obvious. All problems arise due to the inability of the people to reach what is right, to plunder natural resources, to transform the land into property, and the right to property built on them.

There is no property right in the land. You just return the landed property to its natural state and all your problems will disappear. Your need for the state will also disappear.

Like we said, don't tell us conventional fairy tales. Start talking from the book so we can listen to you.

Do not tell us "qisas" stories either. First, explain the difference between "qisas" and "qissa", then we will listen to your stories.

Since I used the word "Bank" in the above text  my friends said that it would not be understood, it should be explained.They stated that you would probably claim that it would not be possible to create a bank. Indeed they are not considered unfair.

"Bank" is the most practical method known to explain how to institutionalize. However, this is a "non-profit" bank. It is the most valid institution in terms of execution and reliability. But it doesn't have to be a bank. For example, cooperatives that you constantly claim can also do this.  Of course with banking experience.

The cooperative can replace the bank if it has sufficient expertise in planning, depositing and securing, organizing and financing investments. However, a cooperative in the sense that you run is absolutely useless.

First of all, although it is not for profit, it has to be professional. There should be sufficient knowledge in terms of project planning, resource evaluation, efficiency calculations and establishing the necessary infrastructure for sustainability. All of the investments belong to the depositors. However, there is no ownership right on the enterprise. Each participant gets a share of the income in proportion to their participation.

The cooperative also does not have a right to accrue a right owner, shareholder or privileged income over the enterprise. The cooperative is only obliged to channel depositors' deposits into investments and to distribute the income generated from the investments in proportion to their participation. Due to this responsibility, it cannot demand any commission or charge from depositors or businesses.

In normal conditions, the bank should be financed with taxes. However, since public institutionalization does not exist yet, it can take a share from the enterprises to be deducted from a certain amount of tax. This share cannot be more than the tax that the business/enterprise must pay.

In other words, the enterprise gives a share to the cooperative instead of paying taxes. Thus, the expenses of the cooperative are covered. Instead of wasting time using your cooperatives for unproductive purposes, it would be more beneficial to use them for building a sustainable system that generates income for its participants.

The cooperative cannot get any share from the process under any circumstances. Only an amount sufficient to cover its expenses can be transferred to the cooperative to be deducted from tax. It cannot charge any other service fee or fee. This is already the task of the bank or the cooperative replacing the bank.